Clement Chidekh vs Anton Matusevich Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Oct at 12:05 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Chidekh vs A. Matusevich

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Chidekh 1 - 0 Matusevich
They have played 3 sets in total, with Clement Chidekh winning 2 and Anton Matusevich winning 1. The last match between Clement Chidekh and Anton Matusevich was at the M25 Glasgow, 30-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Clement Chidekh getting the victory 6-7(7) 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chidekh | 1 |
| Matusevich | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Glasgow(10-30-25)
(F) M25 Sunderland(01-28-23)
C. Chidekh vs A. Matusevich H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $13,980 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.75% (192-100) | Career Total W/L | 61.07% (182-116) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 12 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Chidekh vs A. Matusevich Match Preview:
- Clement Chidekh has a slightly weaker second serve performance at 42.88% compared to Anton Matusevich’s 44.57%. Does this give Matusevich an edge in the match? Potentially, given the correlation with match prediction accuracy.
- In returning opponents' second serves, Matusevich also has a small advantage, winning 46.24% of points versus Chidekh’s 45.58%.
- However, Chidekh excels on first serve returns, with a 29.17% success rate against Matusevich’s 23.55%.
- Under pressure, Chidekh has saved a higher percentage of breakpoints (56.36%) compared to Matusevich (53.81%), which is crucial in tight match situations.
- In overall match performance over the last year, Chidekh boasts a win percentage of 60.00%, slightly outperforming Matusevich’s 57.50%.
- Both players share their best career surface win percentage on different hard surfaces, with Chidekh on Hard (69%) and Matusevich on Indoor Hard (69%).
- While Matusevich has a stronger deciding set performance (64% win rate), Chidekh falls behind with a 43% win rate.
- Both have faced opponents of similar average rankings in the past year, with Chidekh’s opponents averaging rank 360.07 and Matusevich’s 365.93.
- Chidekh has more experience in higher-level tournaments (Challengers/ITF) than Matusevich, who mostly competes in Futures/Satellites/ITF.
Editorial Prediction (October 30, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing their second serve performances, Anton Matusevich has a marginal advantage in both serving and returning, which could impact the dynamics of the match.
However, Clement Chidekh’s superior first serve return ability and higher breakpoint-saved percentage indicate his proficiency under pressure, potentially neutralizing Matusevich’s slight edge.
Chidekh's recent higher match win percentage and experience in more competitive tournaments further strengthen his position.
Although Matusevich performs better in deciding sets, the overall comparative analysis suggests Clement Chidekh is slightly more favored to win the upcoming match.
Clement Chidekh vs Anton Matusevich Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Chidekh vs A. Matusevich H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 11 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2:14:58 | Average Match Time | 2:14:58 |
| 60% (54/90) | 1st Serve % | 68% (64/94) |
| 76% (41/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (38/64) |
| 58% (21/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 45% (42/94) | Return Points Win % | 31% (28/90) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Chidekh Recent Matches Played
A. Matusevich Recent Matches Played

C. Chidekh vs A. Matusevich Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.75% (192/100) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.07% (182/116) |
| 62.87% (420/248) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.66% (413/291) |
| 55.23% (3383/2742) | Games Win/Loss | 52.48% (3593/3253) |
| 69.01% (98/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.89% (46/26) |
| 43.75% (7/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.00% (44/36) |
| 65.65% (86/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65.41% (87/46) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 38.46% (5/8) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.43 |
| 667 | Aces Total | 1459 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 898 | Total Double Faults | 871 |
| 1:35:11 | Average Match Time | 1:32:47 |
| 413.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 481.42 |
| 62% (11527/18554) | 1st Serve % | 58% (11698/20146) |
| 67% (7761/11527) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (8532/11698) |
| 52% (3635/7027) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4284/8446) |
| 46% (1008/2194) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (809/2017) |
| 43% (8291/19228) | Return Points Win % | 39% (8234/20978) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.13% (51/45) | Challenger W/L | 48.78% (20/21) |
| 74.18% (135/47) | Futures W/L | 63.75% (160/91) |
| 66% (188/287) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (182/297) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (31/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (57/107) |
| 55% (48/87) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (58/106) |
| 91% (188/171) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (181/151) |
| 9% (188/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (181/30) |
| 19% (104/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (117/31) |